Questions on Baptism
Our son and his wife were both raised Lutheran, he as WELS, and her exact denomination I am uncertain of. They have not attended WELS church for years, and recently he asked for release from the WELS. They currently attend a free church. They now have a child and have not yet had him baptized. I am concerned for my grandchild and believe that baptism is commanded and necessary under God's word. We ourselves as grandparents are not active members in our current congregation, but are both WELS. How can we work and support to get the grandchild baptized without causing friction or concern? I assume that since they don't belong to a WELS and because he requested a release that a WELS pastor will not perform a baptism at this point. How do we proceed? Can I do the act of baptism as a confirmed member of the WELS? Thank you.
You are correct in observing that “baptism is commanded and necessary under God’s word.” Your concern for your grandchild is very much in place.
While you stated that your son asked for a release of membership, I do not know if he has already been released from membership. Your son may want to contact the pastor of the WELS church to verify his membership status and to ask about the Baptism of his son. The pastor will know how to proceed.
Baptism is certainly important, but so is the lifelong follow-up of instruction in God’s word. Baptism can plant saving faith in a person’s heart, but that faith needs to be nurtured through faithful application of God’s word. If that nurturing does not take place, faith can weaken and die.
You mentioned that you and your wife are not active members in your current congregation. I encourage you and your wife to set a good example for your son and his wife by being active members: faithfully hearing God’s word in church, receiving the Lord’s Supper often and letting “the message of Christ dwell richly among you” (Colossians 3:16), as evidenced by your personal and family usage of God’s word at home. This godly example will remind all involved how to understand Baptism properly and how not to misunderstand it. Baptism provides great blessings—yes—but faith needs to be maintained and strengthened through faithful use of God’s word. None of us want to fall into the trap of thinking that Baptism exempts us from worshiping the Lord faithfully in church or in our daily, personal lives. I pray that you and your family can resolve this important matter. Speak to your pastor for additional input. God bless you.
While I understand the method we use to apply water in Baptism is not what makes it valid, it is God's Word connected with the water that makes it valid. There are some who believe only total submersion is valid. I've seen a list of scriptural references to sprinkling and pouring. Such a go-to reference would come in handy as I do outreach work. Thanks in advance for sharing if the reference is readily available.
In earlier usage —in the last centuries of the Old Testament era—the Greek word “baptizo” did mean to “immerse.” By the time the New Testament was written, that word described the application of water that included immersing, washing and pouring. This illustrates how the etymology and initial usage of a word is one thing, but current usage is another matter. (Consider how the same thing is true regarding English words.)
When the New Testament writers used the word “baptizo,” they were not using it in a way that always reflected its original meaning. Those writers used “baptizo” to describe the washing of hands (Mark 7:3; Luke 11:38) and kitchen utensils and furniture (Mark 7:4). When people claim that the word “baptizo” in the Greek New Testament always means “to immerse,” they are ignoring the other meanings of that word in context.
Many of those same people claim that the baptisms of Jesus and the Ethiopian eunuch prove the necessity of baptism by immersion. That claim is completely groundless. Matthew tells us that after Jesus was baptized, “he went up out of the water” (Matthew 3:16). Matthew does not tell us how far Jesus went into the water. He omits that information because it is not important. In the case of the Ethiopian eunuch we are told that “he went down into the water” (Acts 8:38) to be baptized and “came up out of the water” (Acts 8:39) after he was baptized. Luke does not tell us how far the eunuch went into the water. He omits that information because it is not important.
When Jesus gave the great commission, which included baptizing, he did not specify how water was to be applied to people. If the Lord really wanted Baptism to be done by immersion and immersion only, he could have used another Greek word – “bapto.” That word means “to dip” or “dip in something.” He did not use that word.
In your outreach work, do go beyond conversations with people about how water is applied in Baptism. Share the Bible’s teaching that Baptism is a means through which the Holy Spirit works to connect people to Jesus in saving faith (Titus 3:5-7; 1 Peter 3:20-21). God bless your efforts!
Must an infant be baptized to go to heaven?
As Jesus instituted Baptism, your question addresses children in New Testament times only. The Bible is silent on the fate of children who die without the benefit of Baptism. What the Bible does say is that Christian faith saves but unbelief—not the lack of Baptism—condemns. Jesus said, “Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned” (Mark 16:16).
We speak of Baptism being necessary in the sense that Jesus instructs us to administer it. Baptism is not absolutely necessary in that the Holy Spirit can create faith through the word of God alone.
Can God work faith in children apart from Baptism? Certainly. Since conversion is God’s gracious, powerful work in people’s hearts, God can create faith through the word of God alone or through the word of God connected to an earthly element: Baptism.
Because the Bible instructs us to baptize “all nations” (Matthew 28:19), including children, and speaks of the Holy Spirit working through Baptism (John 3:5-6; Titus 3:5), we bring our children to be baptized. Christian parents follow that up with instruction in God’s word (Matthew 28:20; Ephesians 6:4).
What does WELS say about baptism?
“We believe that also through the Sacrament of Baptism the Holy Spirit applies the gospel to sinners, giving them new life (Titus 3:5) and cleansing them from all sin (Acts 2:38). The Lord points to the blessing of Baptism when he promises, “Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved” (Mark 16:16). We believe that the blessing of Baptism is meant for all people (Matthew 28:19), including infants. Infants are born sinful (John 3:6) and therefore need to be born again, that is, to be brought to faith, through Baptism (John 3:5).
“We reject the view that babies should not be baptized and that they cannot believe in Christ (Luke 18:15-17). We reject the view that baptism must be by immersion.”
Those statements are from This We Believe: A Statement of Belief of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod. This link will take you to those statements in context.
What is Baptism, and what does it do?
Martin Luther asked and answered that question in his Small Catechism. “What does Baptism do for us? Baptism works forgiveness of sin, delivers from death and the devil, and gives eternal salvation to all who believe this, as the words and promises of God declare. What are these words and promises of God? Christ our Lord says in the last chapter of Mark, ‘Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.’”
Other Bible passages that answer your question are Acts 2:38; Romans 6:3; Galatians 3:26-27; Titus 3:5-7; and, 1 Peter 3:20-21.
Good morning. Can you please tell me if your church baptizes in Jesus' name?
Following Jesus’ instruction in Matthew 28:19, we baptize “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.”
My newborn granddaughter will be being baptized soon in a WELS church. The baby's father is WELS, but the rest of his family (parents and siblings) are Disciples of Christ. Will his family be welcome at the baptism? They are leery of coming, for fear of being ostracized.
They would most certainly be welcome! All are welcome to attend our worship services.
While our closed communion practice addresses the matter of who can receive the sacrament, all people are welcome to hear the proclamation of God’s word by their attendance in our worship services.
Congratulations to your family on the gift of life and new life from God.
In the case of an older child (early teens) being baptized, I was surprised to see the pastor have the child hold their hand over the font while he sprinkled the baptismal water on the child's hand instead of having the child bend over the font. The child looked and acted like any normal, healthy young teen so I saw no reason why they could not have bent their head over the font. This was at a small WELS church in Wisconsin. Thank you for commenting.
The Greek word “to baptize” or “to wash” did not specify the way in which a person used water (Mark 7:3-4). One of those ways was pouring water over the hands and washing them (Luke 12:37-38).
A valid Baptism is one in which people apply water and use God’s word. Historically, apart from the practice of immersion, Christians have poured water on the head of the person being baptized. Because departing from that common practice can cause confusion, explanations from the people involved really become important. You would need to ask the pastor who performed the Baptism why he applied water that way.
When having a child baptized in the WELS church, do the godparents/sponsors have to be WELS members? Also, is there a certain number of godparents/sponsors a child should have?
For starters, we recognize that the formal use of sponsors is a church custom. God has neither commanded nor forbidden the practice. In Christian freedom, the practice of sponsors may or may not be utilized.
Older liturgies of Holy Baptism in our churches differentiated between witnesses and sponsors. Anyone could serve as a witness to the Baptism. It was different with sponsors. Since sponsors promised to remember the baptized child in prayer, remind the child of his/her Baptism, and offer counsel and assistance in seeing that the child was brought up in the Christian faith, in accordance with the teachings of the Lutheran Church (especially if the child’s parents died), individuals who served as sponsors were to be of the same faith and fellowship. That practice had concern that people not make promises that went against their consciences or religious convictions.
The Baptism liturgy in Christian Worship, the hymnal used in most WELS congregations, does not differentiate between witnesses or sponsors. It does not ask questions of people who are standing up with the parents. Instead, the Baptism liturgy asks the members of the congregation if they are willing to assist the parents in bringing up the child in the Christian faith. In a sense, there is a congregation of sponsors for the baptized child. It is possible that the WELS congregation you have in mind uses a different liturgy for Holy Baptism, but if it uses the one in our hymnal, there is not a recognition of sponsors. The individuals standing up with the parents are regarded as witnesses.
Parents might, on their own, designate individuals to have responsibilities as godparents or sponsors. That is entirely up to them.
Since all of this is a matter of Christian freedom, there is no specified number of individuals who might serve in these roles.
What should we understand as "a baptism of repentance" for the remission of sins? Mark 1:4; Luke 3:3. Is repentance worked by baptism? People came "confessing their sins" and then were baptized. Did John's baptism convey the remission of sins? the gift of the Spirit (in light of Acts 19:1-7) Please expound. Thank you.
Through John the Baptist’s preaching, God changed the hearts of people. Sinners were led to confess their sins and acknowledge Jesus of Nazareth as the promised Messiah, the Lamb of God (John 1:29). The Baptism John performed sealed God’s forgiveness to people. The Baptism John performed provided the vehicle through which the Holy Spirit could produce and strengthen faith, and also repentance in people’s hearts. The Holy Spirit changes hearts through the gospel in word and sacrament. John’s Baptism was essentially the same as Christian Baptism.
In Acts 19:1-7, the punctuation in our English Bibles has led to some questions over the years. Keep in mind that the biblical writers did not use quotation marks or other grammatical devices that are in our translations.
With that in mind, translations like the NIV bring Paul’s words in verse four to a close before the beginning of verse five. They then have Paul re-baptizing the disciples in Ephesus. If Paul’s words in verse four extend to the end of verse five, then Paul was speaking of John the Baptist baptizing people, and Paul simply laid his hands on the disciples. Some translations and most Lutheran commentators understand Paul’s words and actions in that manner.
Do Lutherans believe that every single person baptized is automatically regenerated (even if they can lost their salvation after)?
We do not teach an irresistible grace or an irresistible working of the Holy Spirit through the gospel in word and sacrament. It is possible to resist God’s grace in the gospel (Acts 7:51).
People can lose their faith after being brought to faith through Baptism (Luke 8:13; 1 Corinthians 10:12; Galatians 5:4; 1 Timothy 1:19-20; 2 Peter 3:17).
If you are interested in learning more what we believe about Baptism, here are some statements from This We Believe, a statement of belief of our church body:
“3. We believe that also through the Sacrament of Baptism the Holy Spirit applies the gospel to sinners, giving them new life (Titus 3:5) and cleansing them from all sin (Acts 2:38). The Lord points to the blessing of Baptism when he promises, ‘Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved’ (Mark 16:16). We believe that the blessing of Baptism is meant for all people (Matthew 28:19), including infants. Infants are born sinful (John 3:6) and therefore need to be born again, that is, to be brought to faith, through Baptism (John 3:5).
“5. We believe that the Lord gave his Word and the sacraments of Baptism and the Lord’s Supper for a purpose. He commanded his followers, ‘Go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you’ (Matthew 28:19,20). Through God’s Word and sacraments he preserves and extends the holy Christian church throughout the world. Believers should therefore be diligent and faithful in the use of these divinely established means of grace for themselves and in their mission outreach to others. These are the only means through which immortal souls are brought to faith and to life in heaven.
“7. We reject the view that babies should not be baptized and that they cannot believe in Christ (Luke 18:15-17). We reject the view that baptism must be by immersion.”
What is the purpose of baptism? Jesus commands us to repent and be baptized to be saved (i.e. Mark 16:16), but since it is possible to be saved without being baptized, what is the purpose for Jesus wanting us to be baptized? Is it possible that baptism as a means for salvation signifies receiving the Holy Spirit with or without water?
Baptism unites people with Jesus in his death and resurrection (Romans 6:1-9; 1 Peter 3:21). Baptism washes away sins and gives people the gift of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38; Titus 3:5-7)
You are correct in noting that Baptism is not absolutely necessary for salvation because the Holy Spirit can bring people to saving faith in Jesus Christ through the gospel in Word alone—apart from Baptism. In cases like that, people will still want to be baptized—to do what Jesus says and to receive, in addition to the message of the Bible, another guarantee of God’s love and forgiveness in Christ.
Baptism is necessary in the sense that the Lord commands us to administer Baptism, and Baptism is a means of grace (Matthew 28:19; Mark 16:16). It is not for us to decide whether or not we are going to do what the Lord says.
Baptism is important because it is a means whereby the Holy Spirit can work in the hearts of the littlest ones among us and connect them to Jesus Christ in saving faith (Matthew 18:6; 28:19; Acts 2:39).
Baptism provides real blessings. For that, we thank God.
I have been 'baptized' twice, first by my mother and once in a Baptist church. The Baptist church baptism is the only one I have documentation for, even though it came second. Even though my mother baptized me first and would have used the Trinitarian formula, I can't actually remember it, and have no documentation. Which one should I view as my one and only baptism?
If you were baptized following the Bible’s directive of using water and the word of God, you were the recipient of a legitimate Baptism. It sounds like your second Baptism was not necessary.
Rather than focusing on differentiating between your Baptisms, I would encourage you simply to focus on the blessings of Baptism. “So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ” (Galatians 3:26-27).
I was baptized and confirmed in WELS. I attended an ELCA university. After some post-college research into my family tree, I discovered the Jewish roots of my family. I desired to reconnect with my distant family heritage. After several years of study under both Conservative and Orthodox rabbis, I renounced the Christian faith and officially became Jewish. Recently my attention has turned to studying who the “Jewish messiah” is. I have been studying with Christians and “Messianic Jews” from various backgrounds for about two years now. I have read on your website that re-baptism isn’t necessary for one who “wandered away” from the faith and returns, but what about someone who formally renounced their Christian faith publicly before a court of Rabbis? Is re-baptism necessary? Thank you for your time.
Re-baptism is not necessary. In Baptism, God offers and gives the forgiveness of sins. He clothes people in the righteousness Jesus Christ won (Galatians 3:26-27). People enjoy those blessings through Christian faith.
If a person is baptized and then rejects Christianity, that person forfeits the blessings of baptism. If the Holy Spirit changes the heart of that person and it becomes the residence of saving faith again, the person enjoys the blessings of baptism once again. There is no command, or even example, in the Bible that tells us we are to be baptized more than once.
As you study Scripture, be sure to cling to the Bible’s teachings of Baptism and the Lord’s Supper. God guide you in the steadfast confession that “Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name” (John 20:31).
I was baptized and confirmed in the WELS. A few years after my confirmation I began to walk away from the faith until I no longer considered myself a Christian. The Holy Spirit has worked faith in my heart again. Is my baptism still relevant even though I walked away for years? Thank you.
Through Baptism God gave you great blessings (Acts 2:38; Romans 6:3; Galatians 3:27; Titus 3:5-7). If you “walked away from the faith,” you forfeited those blessings. Now, through the Holy Spirit’s work in your heart, those blessings of Baptism are yours again. Yes, your Baptism is certainly still relevant. Praise God for that!
Think of Jesus’ parable of the lost son (Luke 15:11-32). When the wayward son returned home, he enjoyed all the blessings of his loving and forgiving father. In a much greater way, God our Father welcomes back those who strayed. His children enjoy again the blessings that they had previously forfeited.
Stay close to your Lord through faithful use of word and sacrament. God bless you.
Is baptism a guarantee of eternal life in heaven? Where in Scripture would it say this? I know of a situation where an infant was baptized because a relative insisted on it, yet the parents have no intention of bringing the child up in the 'nurture and admonition of the Lord.' If a baptized person doesn't believe the gospel, then how can eternal life be sure?
I mislead myself if I think that I have fulfilled all my Christian parental responsibilities by having my children baptized. Having my children baptized was the easy part. (Actually, as their pastor, I baptized them.) Following up on that Baptism through Christian education was much more demanding, but it was all worth it.
Baptism is certainly not a meaningless act. Jesus’ words in Mark 16:16 emphasize that. Baptism saves (Titus 3:5-6) because through the Christian faith it creates, people enjoy the salvation Jesus won for them. Baptism clothes people in Jesus’ righteousness (Galatians 3:26-27).
Yet, if the faith created in Baptism is not nurtured and preserved through the use of the gospel in Word and Sacrament (the Lord’s Supper), faith can grow weaker and ultimately die. In such cases, people then forfeit the blessings that Baptism had brought them.
Baptism is not an absolute guarantee of eternal life in that it is like some sort of lucky charm. As children grow, Baptism needs the “follow through” of teaching God’s word (Matthew 28:19-20).
Would it be proper for a concerned friend or relative to privately baptize a child whose parents, though raised in the Lutheran faith, have been negligent in doing so?
Our normal practice is not to baptize children without the consent of their parents, unless the child’s death is imminent. That practice recognizes that parents have primary responsibility for the spiritual care and upbringing of their children (Ephesians 6:4).
I would encourage a conversation with the parents. If they were raised “in the Lutheran faith” and presumably baptized as infants themselves, ask them how their thinking and beliefs have changed since then. Their answers and responses will tell you how to proceed. I also wonder if it is possible for one of our pastors to visit them and speak with them about Baptism.
Your question about Baptism underscores the importance of that sacrament, and yet we need to keep it in perspective. While the Holy Spirit can plant saving faith in hearts through Baptism, that faith needs to be nurtured through regular use of God’s word. That calls for even more parental involvement in the lives of their children.
Do what you can to encourage these parents to carry out their parental responsibilities in having their child baptized. It goes without saying that this includes praying for them. God bless your efforts.
I was born and raised WELS, but the question I have is regarding my nephew and godson who was baptized ELCA 20 years ago. He has been very involved in his campus ministry in college and has recently decided to be baptized again. As a WELS member, I understand that we believe in one baptism and faith in Jesus for salvation. What reasoning would this campus ministry be giving to this young adult to be baptized again, and is there spiritual damage they are causing by doing this? My nephew felt that his infant baptism was his parents choosing a faith for him as a child, and this baptism is his choosing the faith he would have for the remainder of his years. I'm just concerned that he is making this more about him and not what it is truly about, the power of the Holy Spirit in his life.
Since I do not know the campus ministry in question, I can only guess that it denies infant baptism.
Even though there is no specific command in the Bible to baptize infants, the Bible provides three compelling reasons for baptizing infants. 1) Children are part of “all nations” (Matthew 28:19), the object of the church’s “baptizing” and “teaching.” “Nations” are made up of people of all ages, including infants. If baptism were to be withheld from infants, this section of Scripture would have been the place for that instruction. 2) Because children are sinful by nature, they have a great need for the forgiveness of sins (Psalm 51:5; John 3:5-6). 3) We baptize children and infants because they can believe (Matthew 18:6; Luke 18:15-17; 2 Timothy 3:15). They can believe because God is the one who creates faith in people through the gospel (Hebrews 12:2; Romans 10:17). Faith is not a human decision. God is the one who creates faith, and he can do that in young and old alike. People of all ages are on the receiving end of the Holy Spirit’s converting power (Acts 2:39).
The spiritual harm of another baptism—as in the circumstances you described—is that the person’s action can amount to a rejection of what the Bible says about the power of God in infant baptism and a denial of who is responsible for the creation of Christian faith.
It would be good for you to explain to your nephew that he was not baptized into a Christian denomination. He was baptized into the Christian Church.
Your nephew can be thankful that, when he was an infant, his parents took the initiative and baptized him. Imagine the parents of a sick child saying to themselves, “Let’s wait until our child is older and see if he or she wants to go to the doctor and receive medical help.” What poor parenting that would be. Parents who love their children and know what they need do what is best for them. That is true whether we are talking about attending to the physical needs of their children or their spiritual needs.
Churches that deny baptism is a means of grace often turn baptism into a profession a faith on the part of the individual. If your nephew was confirmed in his Lutheran church, it was then that he made a public profession of faith.
Were the disciples and the apostle Paul baptized?
The Bible does not provide a complete answer to that question. Here is what I can pass along to you. In Acts 9:18 and Acts 22:16 the apostle Paul speaks of his baptism. John 1:35-41 describes Andrew and John as disciples of John the Baptist (who then became disciples of the Lord Jesus). One would think that being disciples of John the Baptist included being the recipients of his major preparatory work for the Messiah: baptism.
What we do know from the Bible is that Jesus charged his disciples to teach and baptize (Matthew 28:19-20).
Some churches do not baptize infants, but they dedicate them. Where do they get the idea to dedicate children instead of baptizing children?
The practice of those churches stems from their false doctrines. Some churches might dedicate children and not baptize them because they reject what the Bible teaches about original sin. The Bible teaches that we are sinful from the moment our life begins (Psalm 51:5; John 3:6; Romans 5:12; Ephesians 2:3).
Some churches might dedicate children and not baptize them because they misunderstand the origin of Christian faith; they believe that people decide to believe in Jesus and that infants are not able to make that decision. The Bible teaches that saving faith is God’s gift to people (Ephesians 2:8). No one decides to believe in Jesus. Saving faith is the work of the Holy Spirit in a person’s heart (1 Corinthians 12:3).
We baptize infants because they are included in the Lord’s command to baptize “all nations” (Matthew 28:19-20), they have a need for forgiveness (Psalm 51:5) and they can believe through the power of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 18:6; Luke 18:15-17).
A common rite for the dedication of children focuses on the parents’ acknowledgement that their children are gifts from God and the parents’ promise to raise their children in the Christian faith.
We recognize that children are gifts of God. We want parents to raise their children in the Christian faith, but we also want parents to use the means by which the Holy Spirit can plant that faith: Baptism.
Does an adult have to be confirmed before they can be baptized?
Recognizing that the Bible does not command Confirmation, the answer is “no.” Because there is Christian freedom in this area, practices will vary. Some adults might want to wait until their course of Bible instruction is completed before they are baptized. Others might desire to be baptized as they learn about God’s love for them and the blessings of Baptism. Our pastors will work with adults and treat each situation individually.
My granddaughter is 11 years old and is just going to be baptized. How do I explain to her what she all needs to know? She has had no religious teaching. Her parents are separated and so far has had a hard life. The only reason she is getting baptized now is because I said I would like to see her baptized before I pass away. Help.
You can count on your pastor to explain to your granddaughter what Baptism is all about. You can tell her that God works through Baptism to guarantee the forgiveness of sins and eternal life. You can share Bible passages like the following with her: Mark 16:16; Acts 2:38; Galatians 3:26-27; Titus 3:5-7; and, 1 Peter 3:21. God’s blessings to you both!
Does a person have to be baptized to go to heaven?
No. Think of all the Old Testament believers who were not baptized—as Baptism had not yet been instituted. Jesus stated that it is the lack of faith, not Baptism, that condemns (Mark 16:16).
We speak of Baptism being necessary in the sense that the Lord commands us to administer it. However, Baptism not absolutely necessary for salvation because the Holy Spirit can bring people to saving faith in Jesus through the gospel in Word alone. In situations like that, people will still want to be baptized—to do what Jesus says and to receive, in addition to the message of the Bible, another guarantee of God’s love and forgiveness in Christ.
Hi, My wife and I were discussing infant Baptism, more specifically infant and unborn babies being able to believe and be saved who have not been baptized and come from parents who do not believe. My feeling was that a baby has to be able to hear the Gospel in order to be saved. In more detail, the Holy Spirit works through that message, and that babies that do not hear the Gospel cannot be saved. My wife's thought is that the Holy Spirit cannot be limited by people, and we do not know how he can work and what his power is. What are your thoughts? Thanks!
The Bible teaches that all people are sinners from conception and in need of God’s forgiveness (Psalm 51:5). The Bible also teaches that the Holy Spirit works saving faith in people’s hearts through the gospel (Romans 10:17).
Can God bring people to saving faith apart from the means of grace, the gospel in word and sacraments? Certainly. God can do anything. When we limit ourselves to what the Bible teaches, then we acknowledge that Scripture does not inform us of any other way of God working saving faith in people than through the gospel in word and sacraments.
Possessing that information, the Christian Church seeks to reach all nations with Baptism and the word of God (Matthew 28:19-20), recognizing that faith in Jesus saves, while unbelief condemns (Mark 16:16).
Can a person who believes in Jesus, but who has never been baptized, enter Heaven when he dies?
Yes. Jesus said that it is the lack of faith, not the lack of Baptism, that condemns (Mark 16:16).
Baptism is not absolutely necessary in that the Holy Spirit can bring people to saving faith through the Word alone. In cases like that, people will still want to be baptized—to do what Jesus says and to receive, in addition to the message of the Bible, another guarantee of God’s love and forgiveness in Christ.
Baptism is necessary in the sense that the Lord commands us to administer Baptism. It is not for us to decide whether or not we are going to do what the Lord says.
Your question is a good reminder of the blessings of Baptism: “So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ” (Galatians 3:26-27).
Was the Baptism of John the Baptist the same as the Baptism done by the disciples after the ascension of Jesus?
Through John the Baptist’s preaching, God changed the hearts of people. Sinners were led to confess their sins and acknowledge Jesus of Nazareth as the promised Messiah, the Lamb of God (John 1:29).
The Baptism John performed sealed God’s forgiveness to people. The Baptism John performed provided the vehicle through which the Holy Spirit could produce and strengthen faith, and also repentance in people’s hearts. The Holy Spirit changes hearts through the gospel in word and sacrament. John’s Baptism was essentially the same as that done by Jesus’ disciples after his ascension into heaven.
Professor Pope, Thank you for the tireless work and enthusiasm you bring to WELS Q&A. It is much appreciated. I have a question about forgiveness and the sacraments. My understanding of our WELS doctrine is that our Baptism forgives our sins for all time, even those committed after the Baptism. I trust in this doctrine, and believe it is well supported by Scripture. However, when I read First Corinthians, I notice that Holy Communion also forgives our sins. I trust that both these sacraments are a free gift received through faith in Christ, but I can't help but wonder as a result if Baptism truly forgives all future sins, given that God saw fit to institute the Lord's Supper as a separate means of forgiveness. Do these sacraments forgive separate "kinds" of sins, or do both sacraments equally forgive all sins, or is the question simply unanswered in Scripture? I read the Large Catechism on the subject, but was still left uncertain, as Luther seemed to focus more on the comfort and strength imparted by Holy Communion rather than on the details of forgiving sins. I trust in my Baptism, but the situation nags at me. Thank you for your time.
Thank you for your kind words!
Your question focuses on the means of grace—the means by which God offers and gives forgiveness of sins to sinners. That means is the gospel in word and sacraments.
Through Baptism—water and the word of God—or the word of God alone, God changes hearts and connects people in saving faith to Jesus Christ (Romans 1:16). As children of God through faith in Jesus Christ, Christians enjoy forgiveness of all sins (Romans 8:33-34; Ephesians 1:7; Colossians 2:13).
Having a sinful nature means that Christians still sin (Romans 7:15-25). In the Lord’s Prayer, Jesus taught us to confess our sins to God (Luke 11:4). Scripture teaches us that such confession is not meaningless. No, “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:9). God provides that forgiveness through his gospel in word and sacrament. Through the message of the Bible alone, through the Lord’s Supper and through Baptism, God says, “Your sins are forgiven.”
Is that a separate kind of forgiveness, you wonder? No. God’s message of forgiveness is consistently the same: “Your sins are forgiven because my Son lived perfectly in your place and on the cross suffered the punishment of your sins.” God forgave all sins when he gave us spiritual life by connecting us to Jesus in faith, and God gives us that same message of forgiveness each time he comes to us through the gospel in word and sacraments. Through word and sacraments, God tells us repeatedly, “I forgive you. You are mine.”
As people who still have a sinful nature, as people who fail to do the good that God commands, and as people who fail to avoid the evil that God forbids, we need God’s message and declaration of forgiveness. God gave that when he brought us to faith and he continues to give that when we use his gospel. God is not stingy with his forgiveness, nor does he give it out in installments. God’s forgiveness is total—full and free.
I hope this helps your understanding.
Did Jesus baptize any people while he was here on earth and did his twelve disciples baptize anyone? Thank you for your reply.
We learn from John 3:22 and John 4:2 that Jesus’ disciples did baptize people. There is no biblical record of Jesus baptizing anyone.
Was the Ethiopian immersed when he was baptized in Acts 8:38-39?
The Bible tells us that Philip and the eunuch “went down into the water” (Acts 8:38) and then “came up out of the water” (Acts 8:39). The Bible does not tell us if they “went down into the water” to the point where the water came up to their ankles, knees, hips, shoulders or heads. We do not have that information because it is not important.
What is important about baptism is that water and the word of God are applied to individuals. There is no command in Scripture how to apply the water in baptism. In no way can the account of the eunuch’s baptism be used to prove the need to baptize by immersion.
Doing a google search for the Greek word baptize, I get the word "baptizo" or "to immerse." Is this the correct translation?
In the last centuries of the Old Testament era, the Greek word “baptizo” did mean to “immerse.” By the time the New Testament was written, that word described the application of water that included immersing, washing and pouring. This illustrates how the etymology and initial usage of a word is one thing, but current usage is another matter. (Consider how the same thing is true regarding English words.)
It is clear from passages like Mark 7:3-4 and Luke 11:38 that the Greek word “baptizo” could mean the application of water in different ways. The context in which the word occurs will drive the meaning and interpretation.
In the Bible, God does not specify how to apply the water in Baptism. Baptism is the application of water in connection with God’s word (Matthew 28:18-19; Ephesians 5:25-26).
Should we wait to have babies baptized until the next Sunday after the birth? Or should we employ the sacrament as soon as possible in the hospital? There is freedom in this area, but why do we wait, and what do we say about babies that die then before they were baptized?
Considering that people are conceived and born in sin and have a need for the forgiveness of sins (Psalm 51:5), there is reason to be baptized very early in life. “How early?” is a question the Bible does not answer. While God instructed Old Testament believers to circumcise a male infant when the child was eight days old, the Bible presents no timetable for baptizing infants. Still, baptizing sooner rather than later makes a great deal of sense. If there is unnecessary delay in administering Baptism and death takes place, then we are left with trying to address another question the Bible does not specifically answer: “What happens to children who die without Baptism?”
Certainly, the Bible teaches that Christian faith saves, and unbelief—not the lack of Baptism—condemns. Jesus said, “Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned” (Mark 16:16). We baptize our children early in life because we know the Holy Spirit graciously works through Baptism to change hearts (Titus 3:4-6).
When I served as a parish pastor in the midwestern part of our country, numerous parents requested Baptism of their children in the hospital before they ventured out on snow-packed roads. A reaffirmation of Baptism then took place later on in a worship service. When I served as a parish pastor in the southern part of our country, some parents requested Baptism of their children in the hospital, but the reasons were not weather related. They simply saw the need for Baptism and wanted their children to receive the benefits of Baptism as early in life as possible. I was happy to carry out their requests—and also have a reaffirmation of Baptism in a later worship service.
“Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these” (Matthew 19:14). Jesus’ words illustrate his love for children. Christian parents show their love for their children and for Jesus when they have their children baptized.
My girlfriend and I really want to move forward and possibly someday get married. She is Baptist and I am WELS Lutheran. Both of our beliefs are firm and we both don't want to agree with the other side. The deciding factor for us moving forward is whether to baptize our children as babies or to wait and do believer's baptism. What I have told her, and what I believe, is we should baptize babies because 1. Baptism creates faith 2. Receive forgiveness of sins - child would be in heaven if he/she dies 3. Babies can believe and the Bible commands us to Her response is that it seems like Lutherans just try to find some shortcut that makes sure we see our babies in heaven, if they were to pass away, and that it is twisting of God's word to just have the outcome we wish for. What should I say, and what other points should I bring up? I know it was long. Thank you!
Another reason for baptizing infants and children is because they are part of Jesus’ instruction to “Go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you” (Matthew 28:19-20). The littlest and youngest of human beings are included in “all nations.”
Also, we baptize infants and children because they are sinful by nature and have a need for spiritual rebirth (Psalm 51:5; John 3:5-6). Recognizing their natural spiritual condition and addressing it is not a “shortcut” of any kind.
Another topic of conversation you can have with your girlfriend concerns the source of Christian faith: who is responsible for it. Saving faith is God’s gift to people (Ephesians 2:8), worked in their hearts through the word of God (Romans 10:17). People cannot bring themselves to saving faith in Christ or decide to invite him into their hearts because they are by nature spiritually dead (Ephesians 2:1), spiritually blind (Acts 26:17-18) and enemies of God (Romans 8:6-7). When we recognize that God works saving faith in people through his word, then we will recognize that God can work saving faith in infants and children through the application of water and his word.
It is good that you and your girlfriend are having these discussions. I trust you are fully aware of the challenges that can exist in a marriage in which a husband and wife do not agree on what the Bible teaches—and the blessings that husband and wife enjoy when they share a common faith. Continue to share the truths of God’s word with your girlfriend. God bless you.
My wife (a WELS member) and myself have been attending her WELS church since we were married 5 years ago. I have enjoyed the messages put forth during the services and have begun the process of joining the church. One particular message that resonates with me is the importance of infant baptism. I have a Christian friend who is in a same-sex marriage who has just adopted a baby from Africa. They also see the importance of infant baptism and are currently looking for a church in our neighborhood that will meet this need. I told them about how much I enjoy going to my wife's church and that they should consider having their baby baptized there. My wife says that a WELS church would never baptize a baby from a same-sex couple. If this is true, why would a church refuse the opportunity to put a baby on the path to God's kingdom? I pose this question on this forum to avoid any embarrassment I meant cause my wife by asking one of our church pastors directly. Thank you very much for your response.
You would not be causing any embarrassment if you were to ask the pastors of your wife’s congregation this question. I encourage you to do that.
Bringing a child to be baptized requires little effort on the part of parents. What requires much more time and energy and zeal is bringing up that child “in the training and instruction of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:4). Parents in a same-sex marriage, living contrary to God’s will (Genesis 2:24; Matthew 19:4-6; Romans 1:26-27; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10), would not be bringing up a child “in the training and instruction of the Lord.” While Baptism can plant the seed of faith in a child’s heart, that seed needs to be nurtured through faithful use of God’s word. Faith that was once planted in a heart through Baptism can weaken and die.
What if a person was baptized "in the name of Jesus Christ"? Should we understand from Acts 2: 38 that the apostles baptized like that, or not?
A valid Baptism is the application of water “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matthew 28:19). Jesus instructed his followers to baptize in the name of the Triune God.
Acts 2:38 does not tell us that the disciples baptized with different wording, substituting “in the name of Jesus” for “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” Acts 2:38 speaks of being baptized in the manner and by the authority of the one who instituted Baptism: Jesus Christ.
Describing Baptism “in the name of Jesus Christ” stresses the blessings that become one’s own in Baptism: being clothed with the forgiveness of sins Jesus won by his holy life, sacrificial death and triumphant resurrection (Galatians 3:27).
What is the difference between Circumcision in the OT and Baptism in the NT?
Circumcision (involving males) is no longer commanded by God (1 Corinthians 7:19; Galatians 5:1-6; 6:15). God commands that all people—male and female—be baptized (Matthew 28:19-20).
Colossians 2:11-12 speaks of a parallel between circumcision and Baptism, and the blessings that Baptism bestows: “In him you were also circumcised with a circumcision not performed by human hands. Your whole self ruled by the flesh was put off when you were circumcised by Christ, having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through your faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead.”
Hello, recently my wife and I have started attending a WELS church. We quickly felt at home there and decided to look into membership and have our son baptized. He is a little older at just under 2 years. As he is a little older than a traditional infant baptism, he was a little difficult to handle, so during the baptism the pastor dipped his hands in the water and wiped it out sons head three times instead of pouring it over his head. Is this method still a legitimate way to baptize? I am still trying to learn more and make sure our son was properly baptized while we on our path to membership. I was too embarrassed to ask our pastor, as we are still learning. Thank you for your time.
A valid Baptism is the application of water and God’s word (Matthew 28:19). The Bible does not prescribe how to apply water in Baptism. The Greek word for “baptize” can mean the application of water in various ways (Mark 7:3-4; Luke 11:38). The Baptism of your son was legitimate, proper and valid.
Don’t be afraid to ask the pastor who baptized your son questions like this. He will be happy to address them. Conversations like that can help build a relationship with him. God bless you and your family as you “grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ” (2 Peter 3:18).
I am a WELS member and understand that we are meant to baptize "all nations," which includes infants among adults. I read that the LCMS requires that parents not outright reject raising an infant in the faith. Does WELS hold a similar belief? I am also wondering about the reasoning for instructing adults before baptizing adults. I understand there are examples in the Bible where adults are taught and then baptized, however, why doesn't a similar rule apply to infants? I understand that they can believe, however, isn't one point of infant baptism to bring infants to faith or strengthen it through the work of the Holy Spirit? Is it simply a matter of different instructions from God for baptizing infants vs. adults?
We certainly want our parents to recognize their responsibilities in having their children baptized and bringing them up “in the training and instruction of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:4).
We baptize infants and children because they are included in the Lord’s command to baptize “all nations” (Matthew 28:19-20), they have a need for forgiveness (Psalm 51:5) and they can believe through the power of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 18:6; Luke 18:15-17). After baptizing children, we instruct them in the word of God. Through that instruction, the Holy Spirit strengthens their faith.
In the case of adults, the Bible provides an example in Acts chapter 8 in offering instruction to adults before baptizing. In addition, through baptism an adult becomes a member not only of the Christian Church but also the local congregation. That means that the adult who wants to be baptized needs to understand not only what baptism is and offers, but also be acquainted with the public confession of the congregation based on God’s Word.
How does one justify infant baptism with the call to repent in Acts 2:38? Doesn't it imply that repentance (and, thus belief) is required before baptism? Please explain. Thanks!
Peter’s call to repent was not an instruction for the people to do something in and of themselves. The basic meaning behind “repentance” is “to have a change of heart.” Because people are powerless by nature to change their hearts regarding their attitudes toward sin and Jesus, the only Savior from sin, God is the only one who can change hearts (Psalm 51:5; Ezekiel 36:26; Ephesians 2:1-10). That is why Peter directed the people to turn to God and his heart-changing gospel in word and sacrament (baptism in this case). The people listening to Peter could enjoy freedom from guilt and sin through the gospel message that their sins were washed away.
You notice that in Acts 2:39 Peter told the crowd that “The promise is for you and your children.” The promise of receiving the Holy Spirit through a heart changed by the gospel (Acts 2:38) was held out for the adults in the crowd and their children—not when their children became adults, but for their children right then and there.
Peter’s words do not in any way change what Scripture says elsewhere about baptism and children. Infants and children are to be baptized because they are included in the Lord’s command to baptize “all nations” (Matthew 28:19-20), they have a need for forgiveness (Psalm 51:5) and they can believe through the power of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 18:6; Luke 18:15-17).
When we understand that faith is a heart-changing gift of God (Ephesians 2:8-9), we will recognize that God can change hearts and plant saving faith even in the very young, and he does. For that we thank and praise him.
What's technically "the pledge of a good conscience toward God" (1 Peter 3:21)? It confuses me making baptism a confession of faith. Thank you.
Baptism would simply be a confession of faith on our part if the “pledge” in the verse you cited referred to people’s actions toward God. In the context of that section of Scripture, and the context of all of Scripture, the “pledge” refers to God’s actions toward people.
The word that the apostle Peter used that is translated “pledge” speaks of a legal claim that may be made in court. Because baptism “saves” by bringing into people’s lives the forgiveness of sins that Jesus won by his holy life and sacrificial death, baptized children of God can lay claim to God’s guarantee that their consciences are clean. When God declares that sins are forgiven, they are forgiven and there is no legitimate reason for our consciences to lead us to think otherwise.
All this is reason for us to think daily of the benefits and blessings of baptism!
Does the WELS make a new Christian take classes before they are baptized? If so, why?
Following biblical examples (Acts 8:26-40; 16:16-34), it is the normal practice in our congregations to instruct adults before baptizing them. (I would avoid the terminology that we “make them” take classes.) The amount of instruction varies from congregation to congregation.
Why instruct? Through baptism adults become members of the local congregation. Instruction provides biblical explanation of what baptism is and offers, and that instruction explains the public confession of the congregation to which baptism connects that person.
We recognize that God brings people to saving faith through the gospel (Romans 1:16), whether that is the gospel in word alone, or water and the word (baptism). In the case of an adult whom God has brought to faith through the word alone, that person would seek baptism—to do what Jesus says and to receive, in addition to the message of the Bible, another guarantee of God’s love and forgiveness in Christ.
Is there any hope of salvation for a child who has not been baptized?
I take it you are asking about a child who dies before being baptized. It is with that understanding that I offer the following.
Jesus said, “Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned” (Mark 16:16). It is faith that saves; it is unbelief—not the lack of baptism—that condemns.
God can certainly work saving faith in a child through the word of God alone, apart from water and the word in baptism. If God worked saving faith in a child through his word and the child died in the faith before being baptized, there would be every reason to talk about “the hope of salvation.”
When did the early church start infant baptism? There does not seem to say much directly about baptizing infants in the Bible. A baptist friend of mine is really hung up on not baptizing infants.
There is no reason to believe that the early church delayed the baptizing of infants after Jesus instructed his church to “Go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matthew 28:19). There is, after all, nothing limiting in Jesus’ directive to baptize.
The rejection of infant baptism is often coupled with wrong ideas regarding original sin and the origin of faith. A “Light for our path” column from last year addressed these and other issues. This link will take you to that column. God bless your discussions with your friend!
I was reading Second Samuel 12 and reached the part where David explains about his dead son, "But now that he is dead, why should I go on fasting? Can I bring him back again? I will go to him, but he will not return to me." David believed that he would be reunited with the boy in heaven, just as we believe that we will be reunited in heaven with the baptized children who have died young. This made me wonder, though, if they did not have baptism back then, then what brought David's son and other children soul-saving faith? Also, what if a child of believers who planned to baptize the child is stillborn?
While some Bible commentators interpret David’s words as stated in your question, David’s words in context mean that he, like his son, would die one day and not return to this world.
The gospel is what the Holy Spirit has always used to bring people to faith. For people in Old Testament times, the gospel message looked forward to the Messiah who would come into the world. For people in New Testament times like us, the gospel looks backs to the Messiah, Jesus of Nazareth, who came into the world to fulfill all prophecy.
The Bible does not specifically address your second question. We know that from conception people are sinful and in need of a Savior (Psalm 51:5), and that the wages of sin is death (Romans 6:23). We know that Jesus came into the world to save all people (John 3:16), including children (Luke 18:15-16). God has revealed to us that he creates and sustains faith through the gospel in word and sacrament (Romans 10:14-17). We know that in the case of John the Baptist God worked in the heart of an unborn child, but that was in fulfillment of a specific prophecy (Luke 1:15). Going beyond this revealed information would be speculation on my part.
Christian parents who lost a child before the opportunity to baptize would not in any way be guilty of despising the sacrament God wanted them to use. In such situations, Christian parents entrust their child to the care of a gracious God whose ways and wisdom far transcend ours (Romans 11:33-36).
Quite often the differences to Baptists and Reformed are discussed when it comes to Baptism. What are the differences between Lutherans and Catholics concerning Baptism? Are these differences less discussed because they are less important?
While there are similarities between Lutherans and Roman Catholics in the outward administration of baptism (using water in the name of the Triune God, baptizing infants, baptizing only one time in life), there are significant differences.
The Roman Catholic Church teaches that baptism, in forgiving original sin, removes the sinful nature, and provides forgiveness only for those sins that were committed prior to baptism. In addition, the Roman Catholic Church teaches that baptism gives individuals the power to cooperate with God in their salvation.
You can read explanations on these and other differences in A Lutheran Looks at Catholics.
As far as how frequently these differences are discussed compared to the differences of Baptists and the Reformed, context is always important. These differences will be discussed as individuals like you request the topic to be addressed or as circumstances warrant.
We can be thankful that God provides baptism to wash away our sins, to deliver us from death and the power of the devil, and to offer and give us eternal life (Acts 2:38; Acts 22:16; Romans 6:3; Hebrews 2:14-15; 1 Peter 3:20-21).
I have grown up in a WELS congregation my whole life. My girlfriend has grown up in a "free" Christian church her whole life. How do I explain that our practice of infant baptism has scriptural backing?
In the August 2015 “Light for our Path” column in Forward in Christ I addressed that question.
From Forward in Christ: When Jesus instituted Baptism in Matthew 28:19,20, he did not limit Baptism to adults. He said “all nations” were to be instructed in his Word and baptized. Think of all the people who comprise a nation. Think of who is counted as a citizen of a nation when a census occurs. All people are counted. If infants were to be excluded from Baptism, Jesus’ words in Matthew 28 would have been an appropriate place to indicate that. Because in every sense infants are included in “all nations,” they are to be the recipients of Baptism.
More than being people who are part of a nation, infants are to be baptized because they have a need for the forgiveness of sins. The Bible does not speak of any age of innocence or any time in life when infants and children are not sinners and not responsible for their sins. Just the opposite, Scripture speaks of people being conceived and born in sin. King David spoke for the entire human race when he confessed, “Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me” (Psalm 51:5). Jesus reiterated that truth when he informed Nicodemus that “flesh gives birth to flesh” (John 3:6). In other words, sinful parents have sinful children.
A final reason for baptizing infants is that the Bible reveals to us that children and infants can believe. Passages like Matthew 18:6; Luke 18:15-17; and 2 Timothy 3:15 provide proof of that.
So rather than a single verse addressing infant Baptism, it is the case of numerous Bible passages demonstrating why little ones too are to be baptized.
Read more of the Forward in Christ article.
God bless your discussions of infant baptism with your girlfriend. Do speak with your pastor if you have follow up questions.
have recently Joined a WELS congregation after instruction by the WELS Pastor. We are eagerly meeting fellow members. Last Sunday we invited a fellow member and his wife to brunch after worship. This member is an Elder in the congregation. During brunch we were surprised to learn that this Elder in a WELS congregation does not believe in infant Baptism, and in fact holds a Baptist view of Baptism. His wife shares his views. My question is: should this man be an Elder in a WELS congregation? I don't want to start trouble in a new congregation, but I don't believe he should be serving as an Elder. Do I speak to the Pastor? Help!
Yes, your pastor needs to know about this. Individuals who join our congregations profess at their Confirmation that, with God’s help, they will continue steadfast in the Bible’s teachings. Baptism for all people, including infants, is one of those teachings. An elder—an officer of the congregation who works closest with the pastor—certainly needs to be confessing the truths of Scripture. God grant you strength and wisdom in addressing this situation, and may God bless your affiliation with WELS.
Can a person go to heaven if they have never been baptized?
Yes. Think of all the Old Testament believers who were not baptized—as baptism had not yet been instituted. Jesus stated that it is the lack of faith, not baptism, that condemns (Mark 16:16).
We speak of baptism being necessary in the sense that the Lord commands us to administer baptism. However, baptism not absolutely necessary for salvation because the Holy Spirit can bring people to saving faith in Jesus through the gospel in Word alone. In situations like that, people will still want to be baptized—to do what Jesus says and to receive, in addition to the message of the Bible, another guarantee of God’s love and forgiveness in Christ.
I feel this is a silly question, but today's sermon talked about Jesus being baptized. Why wasn't Jesus baptized as an infant? Why did he wait so long?
It’s not a silly question at all. Baptism itself was not performed until the time of John the Baptist, and Jesus did not command baptism until the time of his ascension into heaven. What was available for Jesus as an infant was circumcision, and the Bible tells us that Joseph and Mary followed God’s directive of having Jesus circumcised when he was a week old (Luke 2:21). It was at that time that the Lord was given the name “Jesus,” just as the angel had instructed Mary (Luke 1:31) and Joseph (Matthew 1:21).
But more than baptism not being available at the time of Jesus’ birth is the unique reason for Jesus’ baptism. You and I have every reason to be baptized very early in life because we are conceived and born in sin and we need forgiveness of sins through saving faith in Christ. Jesus entered our world as “the holy one” (Luke 1:35). Through his conception by the Holy Spirit and birth of the virgin Mary, Jesus became a human being without a sinful nature, without a trace of sin. So, even if baptism had been available at the time of Jesus’ birth, he did not need baptism for the reasons that you and I have.
So, why was Jesus baptized? And why was he baptized when he was about thirty years of age? (Luke 3:23) Jesus answered those questions when he told John the Baptist to baptize him “to fulfill all righteousness” (Matthew 3:15). Jesus, the Son of God, became a man to fulfill all the prophecies of the Messiah; Jesus came into the world he created to carry out everything in his Father’s plan of salvation. Being baptized was part of that plan.
“Messiah” and “Christ” both mean “the anointed one.” Jesus’ baptism was an anointing as he was about to embark on his public ministry of teaching and preaching and displaying his power (Isaiah 61:1-2). Jesus’ baptism clearly identified him as the Son of God (Matthew 3:16-17) who came into the world to live and die in our place, to win our forgiveness. For that reason Jesus’ baptism is important to us—as is our own baptism.
Can a member of the WELS be a baptism sponsor for a child in a Missouri Synod church? Thank you for your time and your service!
You really want to clarify what role parents have in mind for individuals they have asked to serve as sponsors. The role could range from one end of the scale where sponsors are given an honorary role and are asked to do little more than serve as witnesses to the baptism, to the other end of the scale where sponsors would be in a position of some kind to provide spiritual training for the child, should the parents be unable to do that. If the situation is the latter, it would helpful to inform the parents that the situation could arise that the child would receive spiritual training in the sponsor’s church and not theirs. I would seek clarification on what is being asked of sponsors.
Will a WELS pastor baptize an infant if he/she is going to be raised in a different denomination, one that does not baptize their infants normally?
A WELS pastor can baptize such a person, but the pastor will likely wonder why parents would want their child baptized when the church to which they belong denies infant baptism. Is it a matter of the parents holding to a belief that runs contrary to their church? If that is the case, they will want to be part of a church that teaches the truths of God’s word, including baptism, and which is consistent with their faith. Jesus instructed us to baptize and teach people “to obey everything I have commanded you” (Matthew 28:20). We are happy to baptize, but we understand from Scripture how important it is to follow up on baptism with correct instruction in God’s Word. Do speak to a WELS pastor in your community to receive more answers to your questions.
Who can baptize? Do Lutherans allow lay people to baptize?
The power of baptism rests in Jesus’ promise (John 3:5,6; Titus 3:5,6; 1 Peter 3:21), not in the person doing the baptizing. For that reason, the Lutheran church recognizes the validity of baptisms performed by laypeople. This often happens (and properly so) when there is an emergency, i.e., a situation where the candidate’s survival is in doubt.
A number of needs are met, however, by having a pastor do the baptizing. These include: good order, absolute clarity about whether the person was baptized, a clear public statement that the person is being baptized by the officiating church and into the church, and (if done in a worship service) an opportunity to remind the congregation of their own baptism and its blessings. That’s why baptism by a pastor during a worship service is our normal practice.
My boyfriend told me he would like to get baptized again. He mentioned the desire to become baptized again was strengthened after reading his devotional, which was a passage in Romans. Please clarify WELS' belief on the need for only one baptism. Thank you.
If baptism were something we did for God, we might want to be baptized again—and again. But, the truth of the matter—the biblical truth—is that baptism is something God does for us. Through baptism God comes to people and gives them faith, life and forgiveness (Acts 2:38; Titus 3:5; 1 Peter 3:21).
While Jesus tells us to receive the Lord’s Supper often, there is no command, or even example, in the Bible that tells us we are to be baptized more than once. The book of Romans speaks of baptism as a singular event in our lives (Romans 6:1-2). That may or may not have been the basis of the devotion your boyfriend read. I don’t know.
The blessings of baptism last a lifetime—even beyond. If at some point in our life we gain a new appreciation for baptism, that is reason to think all the more of how greatly God blessed us at baptism, not a reason to be baptized again.
Perhaps your boyfriend read that infant baptism is not valid. In that case, the material he read was not accurate. Again, baptism is what God does for people. Through water and the word he comes to people, even infants, and brings his blessings. How grateful we are for that.
Is it possible for infants to believe before they are baptized?
Yes, it is possible. The apostle Paul reminded Timothy: “From infancy you have known the holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus” (2 Timothy 3:15). Luke 18:15-17 describes people bringing children (including infants – the word translated as “babies” in verse 15) to Jesus. The Lord said “the kingdom of God belongs to such as these” (Luke 18:16). “These” are children, including infants. Individuals become part of the kingdom of God through Christian faith worked in the heart by the Holy Spirit.
Because conversion is God’s gracious, powerful act, he can bring people to faith through his word alone or his word attached to an earthly element: baptism.
I just heard a sermon about Jesus being baptized. Why wasn't Jesus baptized as an infant? Why did he wait so long?
It’s not a silly question at all. Baptism itself was not performed until the time of John the Baptist, and Jesus did not command baptism until the time of his ascension into heaven. What was available for Jesus as an infant was circumcision, and the Bible tells us that Joseph and Mary followed God’s directive of having Jesus circumcised when he was a week old (Luke 2:21). It was at that time that the Lord was given the name “Jesus,” just as the angel had instructed Mary (Luke 1:31) and Joseph (Matthew 1:21).
But more than baptism not being available at the time of Jesus’ birth is the unique reason for Jesus’ baptism. You and I have every reason to be baptized very early in life because we are conceived and born in sin and we need forgiveness of sins through saving faith in Christ. Jesus entered our world as “the holy one” (Luke 1:35). Through his conception by the Holy Spirit and birth of the virgin Mary, Jesus became a human being without a sinful nature, without a trace of sin. So, even if baptism had been available at the time of Jesus’ birth, he did not need baptism for the reasons that you and I have.
So, why was Jesus baptized? And why was he baptized when he was about thirty years of age? (Luke 3:23) Jesus answered those questions when he told John the Baptist to baptize him “to fulfill all righteousness” (Matthew 3:15). Jesus, the Son of God, became a man to fulfill all the prophecies of the Messiah; Jesus came into the world he created to carry out everything in his Father’s plan of salvation. Being baptized was part of that plan.
“Messiah” and “Christ” both mean “the anointed one.” Jesus’ baptism was an anointing as he was about to embark on his public ministry of teaching and preaching and displaying his power (Isaiah 61:1-2). Jesus’ baptism clearly identified him as the Son of God (Matthew 3:16-17) who came into the world to live and die in our place, to win our forgiveness. For that reason Jesus’ baptism is important to us—as is our own baptism.
Where does it say in Scripture that Baptism creates faith?
We will not find a passage in the Bible that states specifically and succinctly: “Baptism creates faith.” We know that baptism is a faith-working act on God’s part by looking at several Bible passages and seeing how they relate to baptism.
The Bible explains that people enjoy the forgiveness of sins and eternal life by God’s grace through faith in Jesus Christ his Son (Ephesians 2:8; Romans 3:28). The Bible states that baptism gives people those very blessings of life and forgiveness (Acts 2:38; 22:16; Ephesians 5:26; Titus 3:5-7; 1 Peter 3:21). Baptism gives those blessings because of the powerful word of God that is attached to the water.
Since the Bible teaches that we enjoy salvation only through faith in Christ, and since the Bible teaches that baptism saves us and washes away our sins, we can rightfully say that baptism creates the faith that connects us to Jesus and brings into our lives all the blessings he won by his holy life, sacrificial death and glorious resurrection.
We have every reason to grow in our appreciation for baptism by which we are clothed in Jesus’ robe of righteousness (Galatians 3:27).
I was talking to someone who said they go to the Jesus Church. He said that people in other churches are not baptized because the Bible says we need to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ, and he gave me these verses from the Bible: Acts 2:38, Acts 8:16, Acts 10:48, Acts 19:5, Romans 6:3, and Galatians 3:27. I know that Jesus said to baptize in the name of the Father, Son , and Holy Spirit. How can I explain these verses to him?
As you noted, Jesus instructed his followers to baptize “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matthew 28:19). Those are the words you will hear at Baptisms today.
The passages cited in your question do not tell us that the disciples baptized with different wording, substituting “in the name of Jesus” for “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” The verses cited in your question speak of being baptized in the manner and by the authority of the one who instituted baptism: Jesus Christ. Describing Baptism “in the name of Jesus Christ” stresses the blessings that become one’s own in Baptism: being clothed with the forgiveness of sins Jesus won by his holy life, sacrificial death and triumphant resurrection (Galatians 3:27).
On a side note, the Didache, an early second century A.D. writing, speaks of Baptism in the name of the Triune God. The writing provides historical evidence that the practice of the early church was in keeping with Jesus’ instruction in Matthew 28:19.
We believe that God uses baptism to create faith in infants—they need it because of their inherent sinfulness. Why is the same not true of older people? Why would we say that baptism instantly creates faith in babies but not in adults?
Through water and the word God can bring anyone – of any age – to faith. The gospel is God’s power to save (Romans 1:16). With adults, we ordinarily provide some instruction in God’s word before administering Baptism because that is how we see the New Testament church functioning in the book of Acts. What we see most often in life is that God changes the hearts of adults through his word alone. That same word, then, provides adults with information about the importance and blessings of Baptism, which they are encouraged to receive.
Like children, adults are in need of God’s forgiveness because of their sinful natures and their actual sins. Christian faith, created through the word of God alone or through water and the word in Baptism, connects people to Jesus Christ in faith and gives them the forgiveness of sins and eternal life that Jesus won.
Is baptism necessary for justification and salvation?
Christian faith is necessary to enjoy God’s verdict of “not guilty” (Romans 3:28; 5:1). It is the lack of faith that condemns, not the lack of baptism (Mark 16:16).
Baptism is necessary in the sense that the Lord commands us to administer baptism. It is not for us to decide whether or not we are going to do what the Lord says. However, baptism is not absolutely necessary for salvation because the Holy Spirit can bring people to saving faith in Jesus through the gospel in Word alone. In cases like that, people will still want to be baptized—to do what Jesus says and to receive, in addition to the message of the Bible, another guarantee of God’s love and forgiveness in Christ.
My wife and I are Catholic. My wife was raised WELS, so we both have a strong appreciation for the WELS and how strongly they hold their beliefs. My wife's brother and wife just had a baby. They are having a non-WELS baptism sponsor and are also having my wife's sister be the other baptism sponsor. My wife's sister has never renounced her WELS membership, but she is not an active member and goes to a Missouri Synod church with her husband and children. My question is: what denomination do the baptism sponsors need to be? My wife's sister does not live around here, so we are sure the pastor in the WELS church is not aware she attends and worships at the Missouri Synod church. As a Catholic, my wife and I take baptism sponsors very seriously as they are there to witness and guide. We also take doctrine seriously and we wonder if we should tell pastor about this as to not be making a mockery of the baptism in the WELS church. Thank your for your time and we look forward to your response.
A starting point in my response is that we recognize that the formal use of sponsors is a church custom. God has neither commanded nor forbidden the practice. In Christian freedom, the practice of sponsors may or may not be utilized.
Older liturgies of Holy Baptism in our churches differentiated between witnesses and sponsors. Anyone could serve as a witness to the baptism. It was different with sponsors. Since sponsors promised to remember the baptized child in prayer, remind the child of his/her baptism, and offer counsel and assistance in seeing that the child was brought up in the Christian faith, in accordance with the teachings of the Lutheran Church (especially if the child’s parents died), individuals who served as sponsors were to be of the same faith and fellowship. That practice had concern that people not make promises that went against their consciences or religious convictions.
The baptism liturgy in Christian Worship, the hymnal used in most WELS congregations, does not differentiate between witnesses or sponsors. It does not ask questions of people who are standing up with the parents. Instead, the baptism liturgy asks the members of the congregation if they are willing to assist the parents in bringing up the child in the Christian faith. In a sense, there is a congregation of sponsors for the baptized child. It is possible that the WELS congregation you have in mind uses a different liturgy for Holy Baptism, but if it uses the one in our hymnal, there is not a recognition of sponsors. The individuals standing up with the parents are regarded as witnesses.
What this means is that parents, on their own, apart from the baptism liturgy, are free to give titles and corresponding responsibilities to those individuals who stand up with them for the baptism of their child. If they want people to serve as sponsors or godparents, they will want to communicate to the individuals involved exactly what that means. If there are thoughts of sponsors taking over the religious training of the child in the event of the death of the parents, that will need to be communicated in a legal document. If parents want individuals to serve as sponsors, they will want to take into account the stated faith of the individuals—especially the confession of faith made by their church membership—so as not to put people in compromising situations.
The membership of your wife’s sister is another matter. Hopefully, there will be communication between her and her WELS pastor so that there can be consistency in her church membership and the church where she worships.
When there are differing views over something like baptism by very scholarly theologians, how can the lay person know which interpretation is correct? Thank you.
What can be helpful is keeping in mind how “scholarly theologians” might view the Bible in the first place. This link will take you to a “Light for our path” column that explains how many theologians today approach Scripture.
With that background in place, if “scholars” have their minds made up what baptism is and is not, they will look to Scripture to find support for their views. That, of course, is completely backwards from how we are to read the Bible. We are to read the Bible and come away with the truths that God has expressed.
Many “scholarly theologians” read the Bible through the lens of human reason. If words of Scripture do not make sense to them, they inject a meaning that is sensible to them. So, for example, since some people believe that they are responsible for Christian faith, they reject infant baptism. In addition to a denial of original sin, their line of thinking is that an infant does not possess the intellectual abilities to comprehend what is going on in baptism, and so they are not in a position to make a decision for Christ.
When we understand that Christian faith is a gift from God (Ephesians 2:8), then we will recognize that God can give that gift to young and old alike through his gospel in word and sacrament. And then, we will not put limitations on the great commission (Matthew 28:19-20)—baptizing only adults.
So, what are you to think when “scholarly theologians” reach wildly different conclusions on what the Bible says? I would encourage you to read the Bible for yourself and follow the principle of letting “Scripture interpret Scripture.”
Don’t downplay your role as a Bible interpreter compared to “scholarly theologians.” Martin Luther’s well-known observation about laity and theologians was this: “A simple layman armed with Scripture is to be believed above a pope or a council without it.” That goes for a simple professor too.
What does it mean to be saved? What does it mean to be born again? How does a person in the WELS church know if they have the gift of eternal life/salvation? Is Baptism essential to salvation/going to heaven? What exactly do you believe happens when an infant is baptized related to faith and salvation? Thank you for your time!
To be saved means to enjoy in faith the blessings Jesus Christ won for all people by his perfect life and innocent death: forgiveness of sins, peace with God and eternal life in heaven.
Being born again (John 3:5-8; 1 Peter 1:23) describes the converting work of the Holy Spirit.
The assurance of salvation comes from God himself. His gospel message declares people forgiven through the work of Jesus Christ (John 3:16; 10:27-28; Matthew 26:28; 1 John 1:7; 2:2). The salvation won by Jesus is enjoyed through God-given faith in him (Mark 16:16; Romans 5:1; Ephesians 2:8-9).
We speak of Baptism being necessary in the sense that the Lord commands us to administer Baptism. However, Baptism not absolutely necessary for salvation because the Holy Spirit can bring people to saving faith in Jesus through the gospel in Word alone. In situations like that, people will still want to be baptized—to do what Jesus says and to receive, in addition to the message of the Bible, another guarantee of God’s love and forgiveness in Christ.
We believe that the Holy Spirit can work through Baptism to create the faith in infants and children that connects them to Jesus. We baptize children because they have a need for baptism by their sinfulness (Psalm 51:5), they can believe (Psalm 8:2; Luke 18:15-17) and they are part of the object of the great commission – “all nations” (Matthew 28:19).
My Lutheran upbringing always taught me that we are justified by faith alone. Mark 16:16 states that he who believes and is baptized shall be saved. Now would that imply that we are not saved by faith alone, but by faith and baptism? Shouldn't Lutherans be teaching that instead of faith alone? Thank you.
Your Lutheran upbringing has not misled you. The Bible consistently teaches that we are saved by God’s grace through faith in Jesus Christ without any works of our own (Romans 3:28; Ephesians 2:8-9; Titus 3:5-6).
Jesus’ words in Mark 16:16 show us that Baptism is not a meaningless act. Baptism saves (Titus 3:5-6) because through the Christian faith it creates people enjoy the salvation Jesus won for them.
You notice in Mark 16:16 that it is not the lack of Baptism that condemns. It is the lack of faith. Christian faith saves; unbelief condemns. Faith in Jesus Christ is absolutely necessary for salvation. Baptism is not absolutely necessary in the sense that the Holy Spirit can work faith in a person’s heart through the word of God alone—apart from Baptism—and such a person might not have opportunity to be baptized. Baptism is necessary in the sense that Jesus commanded baptism (Matthew 28:18-19) and it is a means of grace (Mark 16:16).
So, let’s continue to teach that we are saved by God’s grace through faith in Christ alone. Let’s also continue to teach the blessings and importance of Baptism.
Other than baptism, is there another means of regeneration? What exactly is meant by regeneration? If after the fall into sin man is incapable of accepting the Law or understanding what the Word of God proclaims because he in fact hates God, how can he ever accept God's grace? It is my understanding that we do not in fact accept God's grace, but it is a gift given to us that is ours only to reject. So then, how can we be willing to be baptized if we by our natural state reject God and what he stands for?
“Regeneration” describes Christian conversion, brought about by the Holy Spirit, as “rebirth.” People are naturally spiritually dead (Ephesians 2:5). When the Holy Spirit changes hearts and gives people saving faith, spiritually dead people become alive spiritually. The Bible describes that change as “rebirth” or being “born again” (John 3:5; Titus 3:5; 1 Peter 1:23).
The Holy Spirit brings about rebirth as he works through the word of God alone or the word of God attached to water (Baptism).
In regard to your last question, when the Holy Spirit brings an adult to saving faith through the word of God alone, there would be good reason for that person to want to be baptized: to do what Jesus says and to receive an additional guarantee of God’s forgiving love. That desire to be baptized comes from a person whom the Holy Spirit has already brought to faith through the word of God alone.
In all of this, we want to keep in mind that Christian faith is a gracious gift of God (Ephesians 2:8). Thanks be to God for this gift.
Help me clearly explain a Christian Baptism versus Jewish tevilah.
The difference is that one is a one-time, faith-working act on God’s part (Baptism), while the other speaks of ritualistic, ceremonial purifications that people perform (Jewish tevilah).
Baptism joins people to Jesus in faith and gives them the blessings he won by his holy life, sacrificial death and glorious resurrection (Romans 6:3; Galatians 3:27). In Baptism God offers and gives people the forgiveness of sins (Acts 2:38; 22:16). Jewish ritual washings did not have those purposes; they were ceremonial washings only.
Does WELS practice infant baptism?
Yes, we baptize infants. We do so because they have a need for forgiveness (Psalm 51:5), they too are included in the command to baptize “all nations” (Matthew 28:19-20), and they can believe through the power of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 18:6; Luke 18:15-17). We are grateful that God has this means of reaching out to infants and including them in his kingdom.
Is baptism something we do or God does, and where in the Bible will I find the answer?
Baptism is something God does for us. “But when the kindness and love of God our Savior appeared, he saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit, whom he poured out on us generously through Jesus Christ our Savior” (Titus 3:4-6). “Peter replied, ‘Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call’” (Acts 2:38-39). Those passages speak of God working blessings in people through baptism.
God has done the work of salvation. God does the work of giving people faith to enjoy his salvation. To God be the glory!
I just went through Augsburg Confession and found that we must be baptized and have faith to be saved according to this document. Also there is the passage that states: "Whosever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned." This says we need both, but the second part states nothing about baptism and condemnation. There are many passages that talk only about faith in Jesus as the way. Please clear up the baptism part as needed for salvation. I have never believed that. There are some who might not be baptized that I pray will be in heaven.... babies and adults.
As confessions of faith are often drafted in times of controversy to state the truths of Scripture, it is important to keep in mind the historical context of the Augsburg Confession. The Roman Catholic theologian John Eck had been accusing Martin Luther and Philip Melanchthon of holding views toward baptism that downplayed its importance. In addition, the Anabaptists were spreading their ideas that baptism was to be limited to adults. With the drafting of the Augsburg Confession, the reformers were able to state to the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V what Lutheran churches believed and taught from Scripture about baptism and many other subjects.
And so, Article IX: Of Baptism in the Augsburg Confession states: “Of Baptism they [our churches] teach that it is necessary to salvation, and that through Baptism is offered the grace of God; and that children are to be baptized, who, being offered to God through Baptism, are received into God’s grace. They condemn the Anabaptists, who reject the baptism of children, and say that children are saved without Baptism.”
When it comes to the “necessity of baptism,” we distinguish between what is absolutely necessary for salvation and what is ordinarily necessary. Baptism is ordinarily necessary because of God’s command to baptize. This is the way in which the Augsburg Confession speaks of baptism being necessary. Baptism is not absolutely necessary for salvation because God can create faith through the word alone. As you noted in the words from Mark 16:16, it is not the lack of baptism that condemns; it is the lack of faith that condemns.
People have every reason for utilizing and cherishing baptism when they understand the Lord’s command for it and the blessings that are attached to it.
I was invited to an adult baptism and wanted to do a self-inquiry to find out more about the mad rash of adult baptisms. Will you please help me to process the points in this article: http://bit.ly/2hqNw2k Thank you so much for your reply!
The article is a classic example of portraying baptism as an act that people perform for God instead of seeing baptism as the Bible teaches it. The Bible teaches that baptism is a wondrous working of God that brings forgiveness of sins, life and salvation into people’s hearts and lives.
The author of the article understands baptism simply as a symbol, representing the believer’s commitment to Christ. The author denies that baptism washes away sins. The author does not understand how differently authors of classical, non-biblical literature used the Greek verb “to baptize,” compared to the way in which Bible writers did. The Bible writers did not prescribe a mode of how to apply water in baptism. Finally, the author denies infant baptism.
Baptism is God’s saving work (Titus 3:5-7; 1 Peter 3:21). It washes away sins (Acts 2:38; 22:16). There are good, biblical reasons to baptize children (Matthew 28:19; Psalm 51:5; Luke 18:15-17).
The article entirely misses the mark on the biblical truth of baptism. This link will provide a good read from Forward in Christ on what the Bible teaches about baptism.
Why is something as important as Baptism left to witnesses? Why aren't more people being baptized as an adult and only taking someone's word for it that they were baptized?
Without context, I am not quite sure what is behind your question about witnesses for baptisms.
When we baptize infants or adults, we seek to have witnesses on record. Those witnesses are in a position to verify, if need be, that the baptism did indeed take place.
Why not wait to be baptized as an adult? People have a need for baptism before they become adults (Psalm 51:5; John 3:5-6). Jesus’ instruction to “go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them…” (Matthew 28:19) does not have age restrictions with it. Little children can indeed have saving faith in Jesus (Matthew 18:6; Luke 18:15-17).
When we understand the importance and blessings of baptism, there is every reason to baptize sooner rather than later. Witnesses can serve a valuable purpose in attesting that the sacrament was administered.
I have a four-year-old son and I regretfully have not taken him to church regularly up until recently. I want to get him baptized, but I do not have special Lutheran people in my life to ask to be my son's godparents. Will a pastor baptize him without them?
By all means, do contact one of our pastors to arrange for the baptism of your son.
Regarding “godparents” or “sponsors,” keep in mind that this is a custom of the church that is neither commanded nor forbidden in Scripture. It is a worthwhile custom, as sponsors have a specific privilege and responsibility of remembering the baptized child in prayer, reminding him or her of the baptism that took place and encouraging the child in the faith. But finally sponsors are not absolutely necessary for a baptism to take place. At the same time, if you want to provide for legal guardianship of your son, including spiritual care, you will want to take care of that through a legal document and not a baptismal certificate.
While having “godparents” or “sponsors” is not a requirement for a baptism to take place, our pastors will want witnesses to be present at the baptism of your son. There are no qualifications, such as being Lutheran, for individuals to serve as witnesses at your son’s baptism.
I encourage you to contact one of our pastors to arrange for the baptism of your son. I’m happy to hear that you are taking him to church regularly. The pastor who conducts your son’s baptism will remind you of the ongoing responsibility you have to bring up your child “in the training and instruction of the Lord (Ephesians 6:4). He will also remind you of and encourage you to utilize the church’s spiritual educational agencies. God bless you and your son.
Circumcision related to baptism heard from Calvinist perspective. Are the two in any way associated? What is the history of this discussion?
Colossians 2:11-12 speaks of a parallel between circumcision and baptism: “In him you were also circumcised with a circumcision not performed by human hands. Your whole self ruled by the flesh was put off when you were circumcised by Christ, having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through your faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead.”
While circumcision brought male children into a covenant relationship with God (Genesis 17:9-14; Leviticus 12:3), Calvinists consider circumcision to have been only an external sign that pointed people to God’s promises. While holy baptism gives new life (Titus 3:5) and the forgiveness of sins (Acts 2:38), Calvinists consider baptism to be only an external sign that points people to God’s promises.
We can be thankful that God does not merely give external signs that point to his promises. We are thankful that in holy baptism and the Lord’s Supper God bestows real spiritual blessings to people.
My question is about original sin and baptism: In looking over sections of the Book of Concord, I understand Lutherans oppose the Catholic Church’s teaching of concupiscence. As a lifelong Lutheran I have always believed that in Baptism all our sins have been forgiven and that in faith with a contrite heart we continuously live in our baptism dying daily to sin and we believe forgiveness of sin (reconciliation) is an extension of baptism. My curiosity got to me when I came across the concept of concupiscence as quoted in the Book of Concord so I had to look it up from a Catholic perspective. Reflecting on this, it brings up a question that sort of troubles me: why don’t we as Lutherans believe that original sin, like the sins of omission and commission, can be removed through the waters of baptism? Lutherans seem to use the term “sinful nature” interchangeably with “original sin” and I understand this can be seen as a loss of grace of original holiness which results in man being subject to the law of death as a result of Adam’s fall. From what I have always understood (and from the Lutheran perspective) in this life we who die in the Lord can never shed our old Adam, sinful nature, or original sin until we depart from this world. For me, thinking about baptism as a covenant, it feels like our confessions would then imply original sin (the devil who had a hand in this original curse) still clings to us through these waters and never gets fully washed off at the time we go through the waters which in turn leaves me unsettled feeling. From a confessional Lutheran standpoint, could you please explain? In particular, through the lens of what this means at the time of baptism?
The Roman Catholic Church errs in a couple of directions when it comes to its teaching of baptism. On the one hand, it teaches that baptism offers a limited forgiveness of sins in that it forgives only sins committed before baptism; sins committed after baptism are dealt with by means of some of their other sacraments, including penance. On the other hand, the Roman Catholic Church teaches that baptism removes original sin to the degree that what remains (concupiscence) is not sinful.
Lutherans believe and teach that baptism forgives the guilt of original sin, but the sinful nature that remains is real sin. As you noted, the sinful nature is part of us throughout this earthly life and continually wars with the new self (Romans 7:7-25).
Baptism does free us from the power of the devil (Hebrews 2:14-15). Still, the devil seeks to attack us and rob us of our saving faith (1 Peter 5:8). Baptism is a daily reminder that we are God’s children (1 Corinthians 6:11; Galatians 3:26-27).
When it comes to the importance of baptism, Article II of the Augsburg Confession states: “Also they [our churches] teach that since the fall of Adam, all men begotten in the natural way are born with sin, that is, without the fear of God, without trust in God, and with concupiscence; and that this disease, or vice of origin, is truly sin, even now condemning and bringing eternal death upon those not born again through Baptism and the Holy Ghost.” This is what we believe and teach on the basis of Scripture.
If I was raised and baptized in a Baptist church and switched to a WELS church, would I need to get baptized again? The reason I'm asking is because I know that Lutherans have a different belief on baptism and how it works.
There would not be a need to be baptized again. While Baptist theology misunderstands the purpose and blessings of baptism, the baptism of such churches is a valid baptism. Water is applied in the name of the Triune God: Father, Son and Holy Spirit. That constitutes a valid baptism.
What would be necessary to join one of our congregations is to attend and complete a course of Bible information classes. Upon completion of the classes and, God willing, your profession that the information presented is what Scripture teaches, you would be confirmed as an adult. That would establish your membership in one of our congregations.
God guide and bless your study of his word!